I only developed an interest in history of any kind rather late in life. As a science trained person I did not for a long time realise just how limited and narrow my education had been.
If my recollection of history classes is correct my grades in history were quite good but what I do clearly remember was for most of that time my teacher was a useless sod whose lessons consisted of writing reams of notes on the blackboard which we had to copy down. He alternated that with having us take turns reading out selected passages from a very old textbook. Most of our lessons seemed to be about the Kings of England and explorers of Australia.
I guess it was an effective way of keeping us quiet and busy but hardly good pedagogy.
In the years I have spent here in Laos I have managed to pick up a fair bit of history, both ancient and modern, in my endeavours to understand the culture of the country. Except for a few fleeting references to some explorers on their way to discover Australia, the history of Asia was a complete mystery. It apparently didn't exist until the Europeans colonised the region.
I am constantly amazed at the many parallels I come across in the history of SE Asia and the Middle Ages in Europe.
Just as modern Europe grew out of collection of warring city states so this region was a collection of Kingdoms that were in constant conflict and conquest with each other.
While Europe took a millenium to evolve from its feudal system to a representative democracy. The countries in this region are trying to do it in just 2 or 3 generations.
The industrial revolution in Europe commenced three hundred years ago. In this region it was as little as 30 years ago.
WWI effectively saw the end of the rigid class system in Europe and while it still flourishes here there are signs that globalisation and economic success will see its demise with the next generation.
Even previously long time antagonists are moving to a regional European like Union under the ASEAN banner.